12. Undifferentiated Shock Roundtable

This week the Pulm PEEPs, David Furfaro and Kristina Montemayor, are joined by three outstanding critical care doctors and medical educators to discuss the evaluation of patients with undifferentiated shock. We cover everything from the basics about defining shock, to advanced POCUS techniques to clarify the etiology of shock. Listen today and let us know your favorite technique for evaluating shock in the ICU.

Meet Our Guests

Molly Hayes is an Assistant Professor of Medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, the Director of the MICU at BIDMC, and the Director of External Education at the Carl J Shapiro Institute for Education and Research. She is also a course director for a yearly CME course on principles of critical care medicine run by BIDMC and HMS.

Nick Mark is a Pulmonologist and Intensivist at Swedish Medical Center in Seattle, Washington. He is also the founder of ICU One Pager, which produces high yield critical care education one-page guides that have been downloaded by thousands of learners.

Matt Siuba is an Assistant Professor of Medicine and intensivist at the Cleveland Clinic, where he is the associate program director for the Critical Care Medicine fellowship. He founded and runs the website Zentensivist.com, has his own associated podcast, and is a senior editor at CriticalCareNow.com.

Key Learning Points

Key graphics

Courtesy of Nick Mark and ICU One Pager
Courtesy of Matt Siuba
Courtesy of Nick Mark and ICU One Pager

Definition of shock

– Shock is defined as inadequate oxygen delivery to meet the body’s needs. Decreased perfusion and oxygen delivery leads to cell injury and death

– If you define just as hypotension, you will miss people who have cryptic shock, and categorize some people with shock who don’t have it

– Cryptic shock = a patient with normal blood pressure (MAP > 65), but who still has shock based on inadequate O2 delivery

– O2 delivery is broken down in to cardiac output and arterial oxygen content

Causes of shock

Shock can be divided into three large categories:

1) A pump problem – low cardiac output. This includes cardiogenic and obstructive shock. Make sure to remember to look for tamponade and valvulopathies.

2) A pipe problem – low systemic vascular resistance. This includes distributive shock. Distributive shock is most often due to sepsis but can be due to anaphylaxis, endocrinopathies, cirrhosis, or spinal shock.

3) A tank problem – low preload. This includes hypovolemic and hemorrhagic shock. Make sure to remember about high intrathoracic pressure, which can decrease effective preload.

Examining a patient with undifferentiated shock

– See if the patient is on the “Shock BUS” by examining their brain (mental status), urine output, and skin

– Feel if their skin is warm vs cold and if it is mottled

– Feel the patient’s pulses to see if they are bounding, normal, or thready

Point of Care Ultrasound

– “Ultrasound is the new stethoscope”

– The first step is to always look at the heart and look for chamber size and function. You can then look for pericardial effusion

– Point of care ultrasound then includes looking at the lungs for signs of fluid overload, consolidation, or pneumothorax

– A complete ultrasound also involves looking at the abdomen and at the extremities for DVT

– More specific ultrasound techniques include looking at:

1) IVC exam to estimate right atrial pressure. This test is often misused. It is most helpful in states when the patient has low stroke volume and trying to figure out if they have cardiac limitation to stroke volume vs if they are hypovolemic.

2) Velocity time index as a measure of cardiac output to trend with interventions

References and links for further reading

  1. Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1726-1734. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1208943
  2. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):762-774. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0288
  3. Chukwulebe SB, Gaieski DF, Bhardwaj A, Mulugeta-Gordon L, Shofer FS, Dean AJ. Early hemodynamic assessment using NICOM in patients at risk of developing Sepsis immediately after emergency department triage. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2021;29(1):23. doi:10.1186/s13049-021-00833-1
  4. Hernández G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Damiani LP, et al. Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321(7):654-664. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.0071
  5. Wang J, Zhou D, Gao Y, Wu Z, Wang X, Lv C. Effect of VTILVOT variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(47):e22702. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000022702
  6. Sweeney DA, Wiley BM. Integrated Multiorgan Bedside Ultrasound for the Diagnosis and Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;42(5):641-649. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1733896
  7. Yuan S, He H, Long Y. Interpretation of venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference in the resuscitation of septic shock patients. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(Suppl 11):S1538-S1543. doi:10.21037/jtd.2019.02.79
  8. Volpicelli G, Lamorte A, Tullio M, et al. Point-of-care multiorgan ultrasonography for the evaluation of undifferentiated hypotension in the emergency department. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(7):1290-1298. doi:10.1007/s00134-013-2919-7
  9. Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D, Mandavia D. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010;28(1):29-56, vii. doi:10.1016/j.emc.2009.09.010

Radiology Rounds – 3/22/22

For Radiology Rounds this week we’ll be looking at multiple imaging modalities to help solve the case. Please follow along on Twitter for our live polls and for ongoing discussion of the case.

In addition to bibasilar opacities, the CXR shows bilateral enlarged pulmonary arteries.

The patient was hypoxemic on room air and desatted into the 70s with ambulation. Given her possible connective tissue disease a CT chest was obtained.

Although no ILD was revealed on the CT scan, let’s take a look at the mediastinal windows:

There are multiple signs of pulmonary hypertension, and right ventricular dilation and strain on this CT scan. Let’s review them:

To help explain the patient’s hypoxemia, an ECHO with bubble study was ordered next

Since pulmonary hypertension can only truly be diagnosed on right heart catheterization, this was performed next and revealed severe pre- and post- (mostly pre)-capillary pulmonary hypertension

11. Meet the Patients Series: Katie Fielding on Living with Cystic Fibrosis

We are extremely excited to introduce our new Pulm PEEPs Meet the Patients series. Teaching and learning medicine is an incredible journey, and the goal is always to be improving patient care. Patients are our best teachers about the diseases we encounter, so the goal of this series is to spend more time with patients with pulmonary disease and with those who have been critically ill. For our first episode, we are thrilled to be joined by Katie Fielding.

Katie s an educator and spent 13 years teaching high school science. She now specializes in integrating technology into the classroom to enhance education. Katie was diagnosed with CF as an infant and has spent years as a patient advocate. She works closely with the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and serves on the Adult Advocacy Council.

Katie gives us an incredible perspective about what it is like to live with Cystic Fibrosis, how her life has changed with modern therapies, and how to be the best provider possible.

Radiology Rounds – 3/8/22

We’re excited to bring you another Radiology Rounds today that combines pulmonary and critical care.

The patient is diagnosed with small cell lung cancer and requires a left bronchial stent. She develops acute hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure requiring intubation.

You are concerned that she has increased airway resistance as a result of stent migration. What would you expect to see on the ventilator if this is the case?

Here are some tips from ICU OnePager on interpreting high peak pressures on the ventilator

10. A Case of Fevers, Night Sweats, and Dyspnea

This week, we have another great case episode on Pulm PEEPs! We are joined by Emily Fridenmaker who helps us think through a fascinating case presenation.

Meet Our Guests

Emily Fridenmaker is a Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine fellow at the University of Kentucky College of Medicine. She went to medical school at West Virginia school of medicine and did her internal medicine residency at Charleston Area Medical Center

Patient Presentation

A middle-aged woman presents with 2-3 weeks of mild but progressive shortness of breath with exertion associated with low-grade fevers, worsening night sweats, and fatigue. Further history reveals a progressive non-productive cough and weight loss. She has a past medical history of neurologic dysfunction over two years and a working diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and is pursuing treatment in Mexico due to cost limitations. She has been receiving prednisone 10 mg daily and azathioprine. Aside from travel history to Mexico, her social history is notable for prior employment in a candle factory, and for hiking with some cave exploration. She is a former 20 pack-year smoker and has rare alcohol use.

Key Learning Points

References and links for further reading

  1. McKinsey DS, McKinsey JP. Pulmonary histoplasmosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;32(6):735-744. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1295721
  2. Cuellar-Rodriguez J, Avery RK, Lard M, et al. Histoplasmosis in solid organ transplant recipients: 10 years of experience at a large transplant center in an endemic area. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(5):710-716. doi:10.1086/604712
  3. Wheat LJ, Slama TG, Norton JA, et al. Risk Factors for Disseminated or Fatal Histoplasmosis. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96(2):159-163. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-96-2-159
  4. Smith JA, Kauffman CA. Endemic fungal infections in patients receiving tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor therapy. Drugs. 2009;69(11):1403-1415. doi:10.2165/00003495-200969110-00002
  5. Poplin V, Smith C, Milsap D, Zabel L, Bahr NC. Diagnosis of Pulmonary Infections Due to Endemic Fungi. Diagnostics. 2021;11(5):856. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11050856
  6. Wheat LJ, Freifeld AG, Kleiman MB, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Histoplasmosis: 2007 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2007;45(7):807-825.
  7. Azar MM, Hage CA. Clinical Perspectives in the Diagnosis and Management of Histoplasmosis. Clinics in Chest Medicine. 2017;38(3):403-415. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2017.04.004
  8. Threadcraft MA, Case R. Vape-Associated Pulmonary Injury (VAPI) Presenting With a “Miliary” Pattern on Imaging. Cureus. 13(2):e13385. doi:10.7759/cureus.13385
  9. Raoof S, Amchentsev A, Vlahos I, Goud A, Naidich DP. Pictorial essay: multinodular disease: a high-resolution CT scan diagnostic algorithm. Chest. 2006;129(3):805-815. doi:10.1378/chest.129.3.805
  10. Sharma BB. Miliary nodules on chest radiographs: A diagnostic dilemma. Lung India. 2015;32(5):518-520.
  11. Purek L, Laroumagne S, Dutau H, Maldonado F, Astoul P. Miliary mesothelioma: a new clinical and radiological presentation in mesothelioma patients with prolonged survival after trimodality therapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(10):1753-1756. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e31822e295a

Radiology Rounds – 2/22/22

This week we’re sharing a distinct radiology pattern on chest X-ray and CT scans that should raise its own differential. Make sure to listen to our case episode next week to hear more about this patient and the diagnostic workup.

References and links for further reading

  1. Raoof S, Amchentsev A, Vlahos I, Goud A, Naidich DP. Pictorial essay: multinodular disease: a high-resolution CT scan diagnostic algorithm. Chest. 2006;129(3):805-815. doi:10.1378/chest.129.3.805
  2. Sharma BB. Miliary nodules on chest radiographs: A diagnostic dilemma. Lung India. 2015;32(5):518-520.
  3. Threadcraft MA, Case R. Vape-Associated Pulmonary Injury (VAPI) Presenting With a “Miliary” Pattern on Imaging. Cureus. 13(2):e13385. doi:10.7759/cureus.13385
  4. Purek L, Laroumagne S, Dutau H, Maldonado F, Astoul P. Miliary mesothelioma: a new clinical and radiological presentation in mesothelioma patients with prolonged survival after trimodality therapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(10):1753-1756. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e31822e295a

9. Top Consults: Interstitial Lung Disease Diagnosis

This week we are absolutely thrilled to be joined by three Interstitial Lung Disease experts to discuss the workup and differential for a patient with a new presentation of suspected ILD. This is also our first episode in a collaboration between the Pulm PEEPs and the American Thoracic Society Clinical Problems Assembly. In a series of episodes, we will be joined by pulmonary experts from around the country who are leaders in the ATS CP Assembly to provide content on common and cutting-edge topics in PCCM.

Meet Our Guests

Sonye Danoff is an Associate Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins and is Co-Director of the John Hopkins Interstitial Lung Disease and Pulmonary Fibrosis program. She also serves as the Assembly Chair of the Clinical Problems Assembly for the American Thoracic Society.

John Kim is an Assistant Professor of Medicine at UVA and has both clinical and research expertise in interstitial lung disease with a focus on pulmonary fibrosis.

Shweta Sood is an Assistant Professor of Medicine at Penn Medicine whose expertise is in Interstitial Lung Disease. She is an integral part of fellowship training where she leads the monthly ILD conference for fellows as well as provides didactics for ILD cases.

Consult Patient

A 66-year-old man who is a never smoker with a past medical history of hypertension and osteoarthritis was admitted to the hospital after presenting with progressive dyspnea on exertion to dyspnea at rest and was found to be hypoxemic. He reports 4 months of progressive dyspnea on exertion but on further questioning, thinks he was last normal about 1.5 years ago when he could walk 2 miles at a time. Currently, he can only walk 0.25 to 0.5 miles before needing to stop. He reports an intermittent, dry cough throughout the day that is not associated with eating, position, or sleeping. A full ROS is negative including for rashes or joint pains. His family history is notable only for hypertension and hyperlipidemia. He is a never smoker, drinks in moderation 1-2 x a week, and lives in the suburbs with his wife. His house has central heating and air conditioning, they have no pets, and they have carpeted floors. He is a retired police detective.

His physical exam is notable for fine crackles at the bilateral bases on pulmonary auscultation, and he is breathing comfortably on nasal cannula although mildly tachypneic to 18 breaths per minute. He has no signs of volume overload, no peripheral clubbing, no rashes, and joint exam does not reveal swelling or synovitis.

Key Learning Points

Take away points from our guests:

— ILD is a symptom, not a diagnosis

— The first time a patient is evaluated for interstitial lung disease is the best chance for making the diagnosis so take the time to evaluate them thoughtfully

— Start the physical exam with the hands first. The hands can reveal a lot about the patient (clubbing, cyanosis, joint, skin, and nailbed findings) and it establishes a personal connection

— When doing the pulmonary exam, percuss first from top to bottom to learn the size of the lungs, and then listen from bottom to top

— When reading a CT scan the simplest approach is “Is it a UIP pattern or not?”. This can be your first diagnostic divide. UIP is consistent with IPF, and in select circumstances connective tissue disease, occupational lung disease, or advanced hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Non-UIP patterns have a broader differential

— A multi-disciplinary interstitial lung disease conference is the gold standard for establishing an ILD diagnosis

Gathering the history:

— Ask about onset: acute or chronic. “When was the last time your breathing was entirely normal?”

— Symptoms can be shortness of breath, a lingering cough, or often fatigue and decreased energy. Occurrence is important! Do symptoms occur only with exertion or at rest too?

— “Have you ever had chest imaging before?”

— Take a thorough exposure history, and the weird questions are all necessary! Ask about birds and feathers (pet birds, bird feeders, down pillows or blankets, hunting, taxidermy), mold or water damage, organic or inorganic compounds from work (landscaping, ship yards, coal mines)

American College of Chest Physicians – Interstitial Lung Disease Patient Questionnaire

Physical Exam:

— Assess stability first and foremost

— Lung findings: crackles, inspiratory squeaks (often in hypersensitivity pneumonitis)

— Look for evidence of alternative diagnoses: volume overload, liver disease, signs of infection

— Evaluate for signs of connective tissue disease: examine the skin around the forehead and mouth for signs of scleroderma, look for rashes, perform a thorough joint examination and look at their hands, and assess muscle strength

Imaging:

— Order a high-resolution CT scan without contrast. High resolution means thin slices that are 1-2 mm thick. Contrast should be avoided if possible because it makes looking for subtle reticulations or ground-glass opacities harder

— Inspiratory and expiratory films help evaluate for gas trapping. If present, this may indicate hypersensitivity pneumonitis

— Prone films allow you to distinguish reticular changes in the dependent portions of the lungs from atelectasis

Reading the CT scan:

— Look at the distribution first. Is it uniform from top to bottom or not? Is it subpleural, peripheral predominant, or central?

— Identify key features: reticulation, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, ground-glass opacities, cysts, and nodules

Laboratory evaluation:

— ANA, Scl-70, DS DNA, anti-RNP, anti-centromere, RF, CCP, SSA, SSB, RNA pol 3, HIV, myositis panel, Hypersensitivity pneumonitis panel

Pulmonary function tests:

— A restrictive ventialtory defect is the classic pattern and can tell you about severity. In ILD, TLC, VC, FRC, and RV are generally all reduced in proportion

— Identify if there is obstruction or not, because if present this may indicate coexisting emphysema or hypersensitivity pneumonitis

–The DLCO can be helpful for disease severity, and for raising concern about other co-existing diagnoses such as pulmonary vascular disease, or emphysema

— A DLCO < 50% predicted may predict that the patient will need oxygen with exertion and the patient should be walked

6 Minute Walk Test:

— This should be performed for all new patients because it is important for prognosis

— In the first year after diagnosis, a 6MWD should be performed every 3 – 4 months to assess disease trajectory. It can be done every 6 – 12 months after that.

Differential Diagnosis:

Silo ILDs into two large buckets

1) An exposure, trigger, or underlying cause is present: hypersensitivity pneumonitis, medication-induced, occupational lung disease, connective tissue disease, granulomatous disorder

2) Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia

References and links for further reading

  1. Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(6):788-824. doi:10.1164/rccm.2009-040GL
  2. Raghu G, Brown KK. Interstitial lung disease: clinical evaluation and keys to an accurate diagnosis. Clinics in Chest Medicine. 2004;25(3):409-419. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2004.05.007
  3. Bradley B, Branley HM, Egan JJ, et al. Interstitial lung disease guideline: the British Thoracic Society in collaboration with the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and the Irish Thoracic Society. Thorax. 2008;63 Suppl 5:v1-58. doi:10.1136/thx.2008.101691
  4. American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Consensus Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. This joint statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) was adopted by the ATS board of directors, June 2001 and by the ERS Executive Committee, June 2001. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165(2):277-304. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.165.2.ats01
  5. Lederer DJ, Martinez FJ. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;378(19):1811-1823. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1705751
  6. Travis WD, Hunninghake G, King TE, et al. Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: report of an American Thoracic Society project. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(12):1338-1347. doi:10.1164/rccm.200611-1685OC
  7. Wijsenbeek M, Cottin V. Spectrum of Fibrotic Lung Diseases. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383(10):958-968. doi:10.1056/NEJMra2005230
  8. Hariri LP, Roden AC, Chung JH, et al. The Role of Surgical Lung Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease: Perspective from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. Annals ATS. 2021;18(10):1601-1609. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1179FR
  9. Exposures. hpLung. Accessed February 12, 2022. https://www.hplung.com/

8. A Case of Dyspnea and Lymphadenopathy

Dave Furfaro, Kristina Montemayor, and Ansa Razzaq are back to tackle another pulmonary case! Listen in and solve the case yourself, and we’ll share some diagnostic pearls along the way. Let us know any additional thoughts on Twitter.

Patient Presentation

The is patient is 57-year-old man with hypertension and asthma who presents with dyspnea and left-sided pleuritic chest pain for 3 weeks. He was in his usual state of health until 3 weeks prior to admission, when he developed dyspnea and sharp left-sided chest pain that worsens with deep breathing. His symptoms are accompanied by unintentional 30-pound weight loss over the past several months as well as an intermittent cough that is nonproductive.

On physical exam, he is mildly tachypneic and saturating well on room air with otherwise normal vital signs. He has decreased breath sounds at the right lung base.

Initial labs

Key Learning Points

**Spoilers Ahead** If you want to think through the case on your own we advise listening to the episode first before looking at the infographics below

Physical Exam Pearls

Reasons for decreased breath sounds on physical exam

1. Increased thickness of chest wall

2. Reduced airflow to part of the lung

3. Overinflation to part of the lung

4. Something between the lung and chest wall — air or fluid

Determine bradypnea and tachypnea quickly by matching your breahting rate to the patient’s respiratory rate

Pleural Effusions

Transudative effusion partial differential: heart failure, nephrotic syndrome, hepatohydrothorax, fluid overload, hypoalbuminemia, urinothorax, amyloidosis*, chlothorax*, hypothyrodism*, malignancy*, sarcoidosis*

*these effusions often present as exudates but can be transudates

Exudative effusion partial differential: Infection, hemothorax, malignancy, connective tissue disease, chylothorax, pancreatitis, esophageal perforation.

Sarcoidosis

Key Elements of Diagnosis:

1. Is there a compatible presentation (imaging, physical exam)

2. Detection of non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissue samples

3. Exclusion of other disease that may present similarily

Pulmonary stages of sarcoidosis:

Key to remember that patients don’t always progress through these stages. The system is useful for prognosticating and determining treatment based on the risk for disease progression.

Image source: Gupta Et Al. J Fam Pract. 2021 April;70(3):E4-E15 | 10.12788/jfp.0177

Treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis

Patients with stage 1, and even many with stage 2, often don’t require treatment

The first-line agent is oral glucocorticoids and the typical starting dose is prednisone 20 – 40 mg by mouth daily. The patient should be evaluated closely, and ideally, this dose can be tapered starting at about 4 – 6 weeks. Following this, the prednisone dose is tapered slowly over 6 months – 1 year while monitoring for symptom recurrence.

Second-line steroid-sparing agents are methotrexate, azathioprine, or mycophenolate. These are often used if the patient relapses, or is on more then 10mg daily for 3 months after the initial taper with intolerance of steroids

Third-line agents: tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- alpha antagonists (small molecule or monoclonal antibody therapy)

References and links for further reading

  1. Light RW. Pleural Effusion. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;346(25):1971-1977. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp010731
  2. Feller-Kopman D, Light R. Pleural Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;378(8):740-751. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1403503
  3. Sarcoidosis: An FP’s primer on an enigmatic disease. MDedge Family Medicine. 2021;70(3). doi:10.12788/jfp.0177
  4. Iannuzzi MC, Rybicki BA, Teirstein AS. Sarcoidosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;357(21):2153-2165. doi:10.1056/NEJMra071714
  5. Drent M, Crouser ED, Grunewald J. Challenges of Sarcoidosis and Its Management. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;385(11):1018-1032. doi:10.1056/NEJMra2101555

Radiology Rounds – 1/25/22

This week for radiology rounds we’re looking at some classic imaging signs of lobar collapse. Take a look, respond to our polls on Twitter, and make sure to subscribe to our podcast to get all of the Pulm PEEPs content!

References

  1. Kumaresh A, Kumar M, Dev B, Gorantla R, Sai PV, Thanasekaraan V. Back to Basics – ‘Must Know’ Classical Signs in Thoracic Radiology. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2015;5:43. doi:10.4103/2156-7514.161977
  2. Algın O, Gökalp G, Topal U. Signs in chest imaging. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011;17(1):18-29. doi:10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.2901-09.1
  3. Gupta P. The Golden S Sign. Radiology. 2004;233(3):790-791. doi:10.1148/radiol.2333021407